In journalism, we use a jargon when we are undecided about certain things: the jargon is called ‘mixed reaction’.
In context of the recently dissolved 13-party coalition government and the premature end of the assembly that was set up in August 2018, when I evaluate its performance, I can only come up with ‘mixed reactions’.
The assembly has left many remarkable things and many toxic memories. In this space, I am narrating certain instances which have raised concerns and questions about the state of our democracy.
One such move, happening just a few days before the assembly’s regular term was set to finish, was carried out through a constitutional option that allows for early dissolution. However, it is important to note that this option is not meant to be used without proper reason or cause.
Our history is marked by instances where governments were changed through unconstitutional means. This constant shifting of loyalty by members of the assembly and the resulting political instability have been ongoing challenges. As a result, our political system has faced criticism, with some comparing the frequency of government changes to the number of times a person changes their attire.
The 2018 elections were marred by irregularities, including the introduction of election rigging, commonly referred to the breakdown of RTS. These practices reflect the weaknesses within our system. In the present day, we continue to see violations of the constitution, further eroding the trust of the people in their government.
When go by the book, the constitution does provide for the premature dissolution of assemblies, with the authority resting in the hands of the prime minister or chief minister. This authority was exercised in 2022 when Imran Khan’s government was removed through a motion of no confidence by the opposition. This led to Khan’s government being overthrown, and in retaliation, he ordered the dissolution of the assemblies in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. While this was a constitutional option, the subsequent extension of the caretaker government’s rule from 60 to 90 days raised concerns about the true intentions behind this move.
The delay in announcing the interim prime minister and the establishment of the interim government has raised eyebrows. This responsibility lies with the Shehbaz Sharif government, and the delay has cast a shadow of doubt on the government’s actions and motives. It appears that there is a growing cloud of disappointment and disillusionment among the general public. The system and the rulers have failed to instill confidence and hope.
During the past 16 months of the ruling coalition’s tenure, the nation has witnessed a series of economic challenges. There have been significant increases in the prices of essential commodities, including gas, petrol, diesel, flour, dal, and ghee. These price hikes have taken a toll on the common man, leading to frustration and anger. The government’s revenue collection policies have come under scrutiny, with reports of inhumane practices by government institutions at various levels.
The economic uncertainty has further deepened due to the uncertainty surrounding the upcoming 2023 elections. The country’s economic condition is also a cause for concern. This uncertainty has resulted in a brain drain, with talented and capable individuals leaving the country in search of better opportunities abroad. Investors, too, have lost confidence, leading to a decline in economic growth.
The recent dissolution of the coalition government and the premature end of the assembly have raised important questions about the state of our democracy. The constitutional options available for dissolution must be used responsibly and with proper justifications. The delay in announcing the interim prime minister and the growing economic challenges have contributed to a sense of hopelessness and disillusionment among the people. It is essential for our leaders to prioritize the well-being of the nation and work towards building a more stable and prosperous future.
