In Pakistan, the right to freedom of expression is often suppressed by labeling it as “obscene,” “vulgar,” or “anti-social.” Recently, the Supreme Court declared that the freedom of expression and the right to information apply not only to widely accepted ideas but also to those that may offend or shock others. This landmark judgment, delivered by a two-judge bench consisting of Justices Mansoor Ali Shah and Ayesha Malik, came in response to a petition filed by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) against ARY Communications Pvt Ltd regarding the broadcast of a drama serial called “Jalan.” The court ruled that Pemra can only take action against objectionable content after it has been reviewed by the council of complaints. This decision is expected to have a significant impact on Pakistani society.
In Pakistan, the freedom of expression is often curtailed in the name of obscenity, particularly when it comes to issues related to religion, politics, and culture. The government and religious authorities often use blasphemy laws and other legal measures to suppress dissenting voices and punish those who express opinions that are deemed offensive or blasphemous.
One of the key factors behind this is the deeply conservative and religious nature of our society. At the same time, the government and religious authorities often use the guise of “obscenity” to suppress free speech and dissent. For example, laws regulating media content and speech often include vague and ambiguous definitions of what constitutes “obscene” or “immoral” content, which can be used to silence critical voices or unpopular opinions. Additionally, there are often cases of harassment and intimidation against journalists, bloggers, and other individuals who express dissenting opinions. These individuals may face threats, violence, or legal action for their views, which can further stifle free expression and lead to self-censorship.
The suppression of freedom of expression in Pakistan in the name of obscenity is likely to end with this verdict. This is, however, a complex issue with deep roots in the country’s social, cultural, and political landscape. It is a challenge that will require concerted efforts from civil society, media, and government to address and overcome.
