Taliban restrict smartphone use for Afghan officials

The Taliban administration in Afghanistan has introduced restrictions on the use of smartphones by government officials across the

The Taliban administration in Afghanistan has introduced restrictions on the use of smartphones by government officials across the country. The move applies to employees in both civilian and military institutions, including members of the judiciary.

According to reports, the order came into effect in mid-June and requires officials to stop using smartphones while performing official duties. Authorities have warned that violations could result in disciplinary action.

The development has created difficulties for many government departments where daily communication and administrative work rely heavily on mobile phones, messaging applications, and email services. Some employees say routine operations have slowed significantly since the restrictions were introduced.

Provincial authorities have already begun implementing the measures in local government offices. Officials in some regions have instructed employees to comply immediately with the new rules.

Meanwhile, Afghanistan’s Ministry of Communications and Information Technology has rejected claims that a nationwide ban on smartphones has been formally announced. The ministry stated that reports suggesting a complete prohibition are inaccurate and do not reflect an official government policy.

Human rights groups and activists have expressed concern over the decision. They argue that smartphones are an important tool for communication, education, and access to information, especially in a country where digital connectivity plays a growing role in daily life.

Rights advocates say limiting smartphone access in government institutions could further reduce the flow of information and restrict communication channels available to ordinary citizens and public employees.

Since returning to power in 2021, the Taliban government has introduced a number of policies affecting media operations, civil society activities, and public life. Critics view the latest restrictions as part of a broader effort to tighten administrative and social controls across the country.