Reform the reformersVII   Death of VAT: Preserving a legal fiction 

VAT normally utilizes a system of tax credit (called input tax adjustment) to place the ultimate and real burden of tax on the final consumer and to relieve the intermediaries from any tax burden—Study on Single-Stage Sales Tax (SSST) by Ashfaq Yousaf Tola

The greatest irony of Pakistan’s sales tax policy is not that the country failed to implement a genuine value-added tax (VAT). It is that successive governments have gradually dismantled the defining characteristics of VAT while continuing to describe the system as one operating in “VAT mode”. The legal label survives. The underlying framework does not.

For more than two decades, policymakers defended Pakistans GST [general sales tax levied under Sales Tax Act, 1990] on the ground that VAT represented the international gold standard of consumption taxation.

Indigenous proposals advocating a simpler system were resisted [Pakistan shelves plan to introduce single-stage sales tax, The Express Tribune, December 12, 2015] because they allegedly departed from internationally accepted principles. Yet todays GST bears only a superficial resemblance to the classical VAT model from which it originally drew inspiration [Reform the reformersVI: VAT without value addition? Minute Mirror, July 5, 2026 and Reform the reformersV: RRMC: another unfinished reform agenda, Minute Mirror, July 5, 2026].

A genuine VAT rests upon a simple but powerful principle. Tax is collected throughout the supply chain. Every taxable sale generates an invoice. Every purchaser claims input tax. Every supplier reports output tax. The uninterrupted chain of invoices documents commercial activity, facilitates audit and ultimately places the burden of taxation upon final consumption rather than intermediate business activity.

Documentation is not merely an administrative convenience; it is the intellectual foundation of VAT itself. That foundation has steadily eroded in Pakistan.

The most significant policy development of recent years has received surprisingly little public attention. Retailers with annual turnover up to Rs. 200 million are now effectively subjected to a presumptive levy of one percent of turnover. They are no longer expected to function as fully integrated participants in the VAT chain.

Large segments remain outside comprehensive point-of-sale integration, outside electronic invoicing and largely beyond the elaborate compliance framework imposed upon organised manufacturers and corporate businesses. If millions of retailers are no longer participating in the invoice chain, the first pillar of VAT has already weakened. The second pillar has quietly been transformed through the continued expansion of the Third Schedule to the Sales Tax Act, 1990.

Originally conceived as a limited mechanism, the Third Schedule now governs a substantial range of fast-moving consumer goods. Manufacturers collect sales tax on the printed retail price before goods even enter the wholesale and retail markets. In practical terms, tax that classical VAT would collect progressively throughout the distribution chain is substantially realised at the manufacturing stage through a mechanism bearing striking resemblance to the collection mode traditionally associated with the Federal Excise Duty.

This development deserves far greater academic and policy attention than it has received. If retail tax is effectively collected before goods reach wholesalers and retailers, what fiscal function remains for the downstream stages of the value chain? More importantly, what becomes of the invoice trail that has always been presented as the principal justification for retaining VAT?

The answer is increasingly uncomfortable. Pakistan’s sales tax today resembles neither a classical VAT nor a coherent single-stage consumption tax. Instead, it has evolved into an administratively complex hybrid consisting of conventional VAT for organised industry, Third Schedule taxation at the manufacturing stage, presumptive turnover taxation for retailers, numerous sector-specific special procedures, withholding mechanisms, concessionary regimes and repeated statutory exceptions. The consequence has been exactly what Pakistani experts warned about years ago.

The comprehensive study on the Single-Stage Sales Tax prepared under the leadership of Ashfaq Yousuf Tola identified delayed refunds, fake and flying invoices, fraudulent input tax adjustments, excessive compliance costs, inadequate audit capacity and widespread procedural complexity as inherent weaknesses of the existing architecture. Those observations were made almost a decade ago. Their relevance has only increased with time.

Fake invoice networks continue to emerge with alarming regularity. Fraudulent refund claims remain a recurring feature of tax administration. Genuine exporters continue struggling with delayed refunds while dishonest operators exploit weaknesses in invoice verification.

Organised manufacturers in formal sector devote enormous resources to compliance while large segments of commercial activity remain imperfectly documented. The most striking contradiction, however, lies elsewhere.

Pakistan now imposes a statutory GST rate of 18 percent, one of the highest standard consumption tax rates in the region. Yet the effective incidence across the economy is only a fraction of that figure, not more than 10%.

Exemptions, reduced rates, concessionary treatments, special procedures, fragmented documentation and widespread informality have eroded the effective tax base. The result is a familiar cycle. Instead of broadening the base, governments repeatedly increase nominal rates upon the shrinking documented sector.

Higher rates generate stronger incentives for evasion, greater inflationary pressures and further expansion of informal economic activity. The irony becomes even more pronounced when viewed against the debate surrounding the Single-Stage Sales Tax proposal.

At that time, Pakistans own experts argued that administrative realities required a simpler consumption tax, broader coverage, lower rates, elimination of fraudulent input adjustments and substantial reduction in compliance costs. Those proposals were considered inconsistent with preserving VAT. Yet over the following decade policymakers themselves progressively accepted arrangements that depart far more fundamentally from orthodox VAT principles than many of the indigenous reforms they once regarded with caution.

This is not an argument that every aspect of the Single-Stage Sales Tax proposal should have been adopted. Reasonable differences of opinion remain both possible and desirable. The more fundamental point is that Pakistan has quietly abandoned many of the defining characteristics of VAT without acknowledging that this transformation has already taken place.

Tax policy should not be sustained by legal fiction. If the supply-chain trail has largely disappeared for significant segments of the economy; if retail taxation is substantially shifted upstream; if millions of retailers remain outside effective integration; if manufacturers increasingly function as tax collectors on behalf of the State; and if the effective incidence bears little relationship to the statutory rate, then intellectual honesty requires asking a simple question: what exactly is Pakistans present system?

That question cannot be answered by merely repeating that GST operates in VAT mode. It demands a comprehensive reconsideration of the philosophical, constitutional and administrative foundations of consumption taxation in Pakistan.

The country’s own experts recognised these contradictions years ago. Instead of engaging seriously with those proposals, successive governments preferred piecemeal amendments that have gradually produced a system more complex than VAT, less coherent than a single-stage tax and considerably less transparent than either.

The time has come to abandon comforting terminology and confront institutional reality. Pakistans challenge is no longer whether to preserve VAT. That debate effectively ended when successive Finance Acts dismantled its essential framework.

The real challenge is to design a harmonised consumption tax on goods and services suited to Pakistan’s constitutional structure, administrative capacity and economic realities rather than continuing to preserve a legal fiction whose intellectual foundations have long since eroded. In the coming parts, effort will be made to meet this challenge.

[To be continued]

____________________________________________________________________

Dr. Ikramul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court, Adjunct Faculty at Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS), member Advisory Board and Visiting Senior Fellow of Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE), holds an LLD in tax laws. He was full-time journalist from 1979 to 1984 with Viewpoint and Dawn. He also served Civil Services of Pakistan from 1984 to 1996.