Imran Ismail calls for political dialogue

Imran Ismail has said that although the founder of PTI made certain mistakes, issues can still be resolved through dialogue and negotiations.

Former Sindh Governor Imran Ismail has said that although the founder of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) made certain mistakes, issues can still be resolved through dialogue and negotiations.

Speaking at a seminar organized by the National Dialogue Committee in Lahore, Imran Ismail emphasized the importance of talks to ease political tensions. He stated that his side is willing to engage in negotiations and argued that meaningful discussions are necessary to address the country’s ongoing political challenges. However, he claimed that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif does not possess the authority required to make key decisions regarding such matters.

Imran Ismail also appealed for compassion towards political prisoners and women associated with political cases. He reiterated that despite past mistakes by PTI’s founding leader, the possibility of sitting together and reaching an understanding should not be ruled out. According to him, dialogue remains the most effective way to move forward and promote national stability.

Commenting on Pakistan’s role in facilitating talks between Iran and the United States, he said that the country’s successful diplomatic efforts should ultimately translate into benefits for ordinary citizens.

During the same seminar, former Punjab Governor Chaudhry Sarwar highlighted that political leaders across the world regularly resolve differences through negotiations. He maintained that international recognition of recent diplomatic developments reflected Pakistan’s growing importance on the global stage. Sarwar also expressed solidarity with the sisters of PTI’s founder and warned that any disruption to Pakistan’s water supply could have devastating consequences for the country’s agricultural sector.

Meanwhile, Mahmood Moulvi remarked that some individuals within PTI were benefiting politically from continued confrontation and polarization, suggesting that reconciliation should be prioritized over conflict.