Twenty-five years after 9/11—IX From heroin & Kalashnikovs to synthetics & drones

Dr. Ikramul Haq
By
Dr. Ikramul Haq
Dr. Ikramul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court, specialises in constitutional, corporate, media, ML/CFT related laws, IT, intellectual property, arbitration and international tax laws. He is country editor...
12 Min Read

Summary

  • 11–15; UNODC, World Drug Report 2026, section on the expansion and geographical flexibility of synthetic drug manufacture.
  • International Narcotics Control Board, Report for 2025, South Asia section; United Nations in Pakistan, “UNODC Pakistan, Pakistan Customs and ANF host 8th IREN expert-level meeting”, April 10, 2026.
  • UNODC, World Drug Report 2026, section on drugs and the Internet.
AI Generated Summary

In 1991, the architecture of Pakistan’s drug crisis was brutally visible: poppy fields beyond the western border, heroin laboratories in the tribal belt, armed convoys on mountain routes, Kalashnikovs in the bazaar and cash entering property and politics. Today, part of that architecture can fit inside a laboratory, a commercial drone and a mobile telephone. The merchandise, delivery system and means of payment have changed. The bargain between illicit profit, armed protection and official neglect has not.1

This is the next mutation of “heroinisation and militarisation”. Synthetic drugs reduce dependence on land and seasons. Drones reduce dependence on human couriers. Encrypted platforms separate buyer from seller, while digital value can cross jurisdictions before an investigator obtains the first record. These tools make the old economy faster, more dispersed and harder to see as a whole.

Heroin begins with a crop. Methamphetamine begins with chemicals, equipment and knowledge. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) describes synthetic manufacture as flexible, scalable and capable of relocation. Its World Drug Report 2026 warns that geographical flexibility and short production chains give synthetic drugs the potential to supplant plant-based drugs.

A poppy field can be photographed and destroyed. A laboratory can move; a controlled precursor can be replaced by a pre-precursor; a recipe can be altered faster than a schedule of prohibited substances.2

The regional evidence is no longer marginal. The International Narcotics Control Board reported that Pakistan seized 15.1 tonnes of methamphetamine in 2024, up from 11.4 tonnes in 2023. Separately, the United Nations in Pakistan recorded Anti-Narcotics Force seizures of 1.7 tonnes in 2024 and 1.3 tonnes in 2025. The reporting scopes differ, but the message is clear: “ice” is not a fashionable side issue. Pakistan is exposed as a market, route and enforcement theatre for an industrialising trade.3

Afghanistan’s opium contraction does not end this danger. UNODC has found that the frequency of methamphetamine seizures within 3,000 kilometres of Afghanistan continued to rise after the 2022 narcotics ban, reaching about two and a half times the third-quarter 2021 baseline by the end of 2023. Its regional roadmap notes that large-scale trafficking outside Afghanistan continued even as opiate seizures declined. Prohibition struck the visible crop; adaptive organisations retained routes, customers, protection and capital.4

Synthetic drugs invert the old geography. Production can move closer to consumers or ports, while diversion hides within legitimate chemical and pharmaceutical supply chains. Small molecular changes can produce new psychoactive substances before law and laboratories know what they are confronting. In 2024, 755 such substances were reported globally, the highest number recorded in a single year. The threat is a production system designed to outrun classification.5

The drone performs a similar operation on transport. It does not replace trucks, containers, fishing vessels or human networks that carry the largest volumes. It shortens the most dangerous leg. A small aircraft can cross a fenced or patrolled strip, release a compact high-value load at programmed coordinates and spare the organiser the risk of sending a courier through a checkpoint.

This is no longer conjecture along the India-Pakistan border. India’s Border Security Force reported seizing 245 drones, 254 kilograms of heroin and arms or ammunition on the Punjab frontier during 2024; official Indian reporting put the 2025 figures at 272 drones and more than 367 kilograms of heroin. These are one State’s enforcement claims, not judicial findings against another State or its people. They demand reciprocal investigation: serial numbers, flight data, payload fingerprints, telephone links, payment trails and prosecutions—not television nationalism.6

The symbolism is stark. The Kalashnikov and heroin once travelled through overlapping human chains. Now narcotics and weapons can share an unmanned delivery system. The conjunction identified in our 1991 study has not disappeared; it has acquired rotors, satellite navigation and disposable hardware. Buying more anti-drone equipment may intercept machines. It will not identify the financier who treats every lost drone as an operating expense.

The marketplace has also moved onto ordinary screens. UNODC estimates that darknet sales, mostly drug-related, reached about US$2.5 billion in 2025. Wholesale activity increasingly uses darknet markets, while much retail online dealing occurs through social media.

The popular picture of a technically gifted criminal hiding in an inaccessible corner of the internet is therefore incomplete. A seller can advertise through familiar platforms, shift a conversation to an encrypted service, use a parcel or rider for delivery and receive value through several financial channels.7

Virtual assets add speed and reach, but they should not become a new excuse for intellectual laziness. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) reported in 2025 that stablecoin use by drug traffickers, terrorist financiers and other illicit actors had increased, and that stablecoins accounted for most illicit activity visible on public blockchains. That does not mean cryptocurrency has displaced cash, hawala, gold, trade misinvoicing, property or front businesses. The modern network mixes them. It uses digital value where useful, then seeks an exit into assets that appear lawful and durable.8

This exposes a central failure of the “War on Terror”. For two decades, Washington and its partners built an enormous machinery for locating targets and striking armed men, but not an equally relentless system for tracing precursors, beneficial owners, protected transporters and laundered fortunes. If the real objective had been durable civilian order, financial investigation, public health and accountable institutions would have been the centre of strategy, not supporting acts in a military spectacle.

Pakistan still answers an integrated market with divided institutions. The Anti-Narcotics Force sees a consignment; Customs sees an import; police see an unlicensed drone; the Financial Monitoring Unit sees a suspicious transaction; the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority sees a platform; health authorities see an overdose; tax and land agencies see wealth. The trafficker sees one business. Until the State does the same, each agency will win its fragment while the network survives.

The response must begin before manufacture. High-risk chemicals require records from import or domestic production to the final industrial user, checked against capacity, consumption and waste. Suspicious orders, shell purchasers and unexplained losses should trigger joint chemical and financial inquiries. Laboratories must identify emerging substances quickly, while hospitals feed anonymised toxicology signals into an early-warning system. Regulation should protect legitimate industry while making diversion traceable.

Drone enforcement must likewise move beyond interception counts. Registration, import data, repair records, radio-frequency evidence, recovered navigation components and financial transactions should be fused into case files. Pakistan and India may disagree on almost everything, but neither benefits when criminals exploit mutual hostility as a safe passage. Evidence-sharing through agreed technical channels would serve both societies without requiring either government to surrender its political position.

Online enforcement must remain evidence-based and lawful. Blanket internet restrictions punish citizens and drive illicit trade towards less visible channels. Pakistan needs authorised digital investigations, preserved platform evidence, regulated virtual-asset service providers, prompt cross-border requests and asset confiscation after due process. The aim is to prevent technological convenience from becoming financial immunity.

Supply control alone will still fail. Pakistan needs a current national drug-use survey, accessible treatment, trained emergency staff and honest education. A State that counts seizures but not dependency, poisoning, recovery or relapse measures activity rather than harm. The human being must not disappear behind the kilogram.

The old symbols remain because the old structures remain. Heroin still moves. Kalashnikovs still kill. Cash and hawala still settle accounts. Synthetic drugs, drones and digital finance have been added to them, compressing production, movement and payment. The lesson after twenty-five years is merciless: a security policy that attacks instruments while preserving incentives manufactures its own obsolescence. Part X will examine another casualty of this bargain—the security State itself.9

Endnotes

  1. Ikramul Haq, Pakistan: From Hash to Heroin (Lahore: Annoor Printers and Publishers, 1991), chapters 2, 4 and 12; Ikramul Haq, Pakistan: From Drug-trap to Debt-trap, edited by Huzaima Bukhari (Lahore: Lahore Law Publications, 2003), Preface, pp. xiii–xiv, and Epilogue, pp. 262–264.
  2. UNODC, Global Synthetic Drugs Assessment 2020, pp. 11–15; UNODC, World Drug Report 2026, section on the expansion and geographical flexibility of synthetic drug manufacture.
  3. International Narcotics Control Board, Report for 2025, South Asia section; United Nations in Pakistan, “UNODC Pakistan, Pakistan Customs and ANF host 8th IREN expert-level meeting”, April 10, 2026.
  4. UNODC, Afghanistan Opium Survey 2025, pp. 26–27; UNODC, Roadmap for Afghanistan 2025–2027, pp. 12–14.
  5. UNODC, World Drug Report 2026: Special points of interest, section on new psychoactive substances; UNODC, Early Warning Advisory on New Psychoactive Substances.
  6. Government of India, Press Information Bureau, “Special DG BSF Western Command Chandigarh”, January 22, 2024; Akashvani, “BSF seizes 245 drones smuggling arms and narcotics from Pakistan in Punjab”, November 30, 2024; Akashvani, “BSF seizes 272 drones, over 367 kg heroin along Punjab border in 2025”, November 30, 2025.
  7. UNODC, World Drug Report 2026, section on drugs and the Internet. UNODC estimated darknet sales at around US$2.5 billion in 2025 and reported that much retail online activity occurs through social media.
  8. Financial Action Task Force, Targeted Update on Implementation of the FATF Standards on Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers, June 2025, pp. 4–7 and 31–33; FATF, Comprehensive Update on Terrorist Financing Risks, 2025.
  9. UNODC, The Synthetic Drug Phenomenon, in World Drug Report 2023; National Counter Terrorism Authority, “Revised National Action Plan, 2021”, especially the measures connecting terrorist finance with narcotics and weapons trafficking.

[To be continued]

Dr. Ikramul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court, Adjunct Faculty at Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS), member Advisory Board and Visiting Senior Fellow of Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE), holds an LLD in tax laws. He was full-time journalist from 1979 to 1984 with Viewpoint and Dawn. He also served Civil Services of Pakistan from 1984 to 1996

 

We welcome your contributions! Submit your blogs, opinion pieces, press releases, news story pitches, and news features to opinion@minutemirror.com.pk and minutemirrormail@gmail.com
Share This Article
Dr. Ikramul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court, specialises in constitutional, corporate, media, ML/CFT related laws, IT, intellectual property, arbitration and international tax laws. He is country editor and correspondent of International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation (IBFD) and member of International Fiscal Association (IFA). He is Visiting Faculty at Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS) and member Advisory Board and Visiting Senior Fellow of Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE). He can be reached on Twitter @DrIkramulHaq.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *