80 countries demand Hormuz reopening

Around 80 countries have called for the urgent reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, warning that continued disruption in the strategic waterway is creating risks for international shipping, maritime security and global trade.

The demand was made through a joint statement delivered at the United Nations by Bahrain’s Foreign Minister Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani. The statement was backed by Gulf Arab countries and several major Western powers.

The countries called for the restoration of safe and unrestricted navigation through the Strait of Hormuz. They also urged that commercial vessels should be allowed to pass safely without additional tolls, conditions or charges.

The statement specifically criticised Iran’s actions around the strategic waterway. It said the situation was affecting international security as well as established navigation rights and freedoms.

The coalition also condemned renewed attacks by Yemen’s Houthis. It criticised their strikes against Saudi Arabia and attacks in the Red Sea, saying further escalation could increase pressure on international maritime routes.

The countries also raised concerns over the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. They warned that any further Houthi advance towards the strategic passage could create additional risks for shipping, maritime security and international commerce.

The Strait of Hormuz is a key route for global energy shipments. Any prolonged disruption can affect maritime traffic and energy markets because of the waterway’s importance to international trade.

The latest statement comes amid wider tensions involving Iran, Saudi Arabia and Yemen’s Houthi movement. Recent incidents in the region have increased concerns over the safety of commercial vessels and the movement of energy supplies.

Bahrain said the threat to regional maritime security remains serious. The country has been among those calling for stronger protection of navigation and the uninterrupted movement of commercial shipping.

Iran and the Houthis have described their actions as defensive. Their position contrasts with the concerns expressed by the countries backing the joint statement, which said continued disruption could have broader consequences for international trade and energy security.